Next: Coordinate Systems, Points, Vectors
Up: math_for_intro_physics
Previous: Complex Numbers
Contents
Algebra13 is a reasoning process that is one of
the fundamental cornerstones of mathematical reasoning. As far as we
are concerned, it consists of two things:
- Representing numbers of one sort or another (where we could
without loss of generality assume that they are complex numbers,
since real numbers are complex, rational and irrational numbers are
real, integers are rational, and natural numbers are integer) with symbols. In physics this representation isn't only a matter of knowns
and unknowns - we will often use algebraic symbols for numbers we know
or for parameters in problems even when their value is actually given as
part of the problem. In fact, with only a relatively few exceptions, we
will prefer to use symbols as much as we can to permit our algebraic
manipulations to eliminate as much eventual arithmetic
(computation involving actual numbers) as possible.
- Performing a sequence of algebraic transformations of a set
of equations or inequalities to convert it from one form to another
(desired) form. These transformations are generally based on the set of
arithmetic operations defined (and permitted!) over the field(s) of the
number type(s) being manipulated.
That's it.
Note well that it isn't always a matter of solving for some unknown
variable. Algebra is just as often used to derive relations and hence
gain insight into a system being studied. Algebra is in some sense the
language of physics.
The transformations of algebra applied to equalities (the most common
case) can be summarized as follows (non-exhaustively). If one is given
one or more equations involving a set of variables
one can:
- Add any scalar number or well defined and consistent symbol to
both sides of any equation. Note that in physics problems, symbols
carry units and it is necessary to add only symbols that have the
same units as we cannot, for example, add seconds to kilograms and
end up with a result that makes any sense!
- Subtract any scalar number or consistent symbol ditto. This
isn't really a separate rule, as subtraction is just adding a negative
quantity.
- Multiplying both sides of an equation by any scalar number or
consistent symbol. In physics one can multiply symbols with
different units, such an equation with (net) units of meters times
symbols given in seconds.
- Dividing both sides of an equation ditto, save that one has to be
careful when performing symbolic divisions to avoid points where
division is not permitted or defined (e.g. dividing by zero or a
variable that might take on the value of zero). Note that dividing one
unit by another in physics is also permitted, so that one can sensibly
divide length in meters by time in seconds.
- Taking both sides of an equation to any power. Again some care
must be exercised, especially if the equation can take on negative or
complex values or has any sort of domain restrictions. For fractional
powers, one may well have to specify the branch of the result
(which of many possible roots one intends to use) as well.
- Placing the two sides of any equality into almost any
functional or algebraic form, either given or known, as if they are
variables of that function. Here there are some serious caveats in both
math and physics. In physics, the most important one is that if the
functional form has a power-series expansion then the equality one
substitutes in must be dimensionless. This is easy to understand.
Supposed I know that
is a length in meters. I could try to
form the exponential of
:
, but if I expand this expression,
which is nonsense! How can I add
meters to meters-squared? I can only exponentiate
if it is
dimensionless. In mathematics one has to worry about the domain and
range. Suppose I have the relation
where
is a real
(dimensionless) expression, and I wish to take the
of both
sides. Well, the range of cosine is only
to
, and my
function
is clearly strictly larger than 2 and cannot have an
inverse cosine! This is obviously a powerful, but dangerous tool.
Next: Coordinate Systems, Points, Vectors
Up: math_for_intro_physics
Previous: Complex Numbers
Contents
Robert G. Brown
2011-04-19